SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Del) 2137

MUKUL MUDGAL, REVA KHETRAPAL
RAVINDER KUMAR @ RAVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.S.MISHRA, Sunil Sharma

REVA KHETRAPAL, J.

( 1 ) TWO young boys, the appellants Amit Kumar and Ravinder Kumar, with another young boy named Suman are alleged to have murdered Noor Alam @ Shibu, aged 5 years in the night intervening 9th / 10th November, 1999. The trial of accused Suman is being conduced by the Juvenile Court while the appellants Amit kumar and Ravinder Kumar were tried by a learned Additional Sessions Judge and on the basis of circumstantial evidence adduced by the prosecution, have suffered life sentence for the offences under Sections 302/364/34 IPC. Both the appellants are further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years besides fine for the off ence punishable under Section 201 Indian Penal code.

( 2 ) IT is proposed to dispose of both the appeals by this common order in view of the fact that identical questions of fact and law arise in both the appeals.

( 3 ) THE appeals though preferred for setting aside the conviction, during the pendency of the appeals Mr. R. S. Mishra, counsel for the appellant Ravinder kumar and Mr. I. B. S. Thokchom, counsel for the appellant Amit Kumar stated that they did not wish to press the appeals on merits as the appellants were entit



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top