S.MURALIDHAR
SURINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SWARN SINGH – Respondent
1. This appeal is directed against an order dated 24th January, 2008 passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the plaintiff’s IA No. 3002/2000 under order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure (‘CPC’) seeking to amend the plaint in CS (OS) No. 166/1997.
2. The aforementioned suit was filed by the respondent plaintiff on 25th January 1997 against the appellants defendants for specific performance in relation to an agricultural land in Village Malikpur Kohi alias Rangpuri, Tehsil Mehrauli, New Delhi (hereafter the property). The case set up by the plaintiff was that the total sale consideration had been agreed at Rs.29,25,000/-. According to the plaintiff, he had paid Rs.6,00,000/-on 16th June, 1993, Rs. 5,00,000/-on 11th December, 1993 and Rs. 17 lakhs on 11th January, 1995. He claimed that on each of these occasions receipts-cum-agreements had been executed. Although Rs.28 lakhs had been paid to the defendants, no regular receipts were issued but a formal receipt for Rs.1,25,000/-was executed on 23rd May, 1993 by defendant No.3 (appellant No. 3 herein) on behalf of all the defendants. According to the plaintiff, despite the statutory permission being gra
Usha Balasaheb Swami v. Kiran Appaso Swami (2007) 5 SCC 602
Andhra Bank v. ABN Amro Bank (2007) 6 SCC 167
B.K. Narayana Pillai v. Parameswaran Pillai (2000) I SCC 712
Punjab National Bank v. Indian Bank (2003) 6 SCC 79
Muni Lal v. Oriental Fire & General Insurance Co. Ltd. (1996) I SCC 90
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.