IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Honble Judges: Ajit Prakash Shah, C.J. and Sanjiv Khanna, J.
Appellants: Rohit Dhupar and Ors.
Vs.
Respondent: LT. Governor and Ors.
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 6968 of 2000
Decided On: 03.03.2009
Sanjiv Khanna, J.
.1. The five petitioners are residents of New Friends Colony and have filed the present Public Interest Litigation for quashing and setting aside allotment of 500 sq. mts. of land to the New Friends Colony Temple Society (hereinafter referred to as respondent No. 5, for short) by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as DDA, for short). It is alleged in the Petition that this 500 sq.mts. is part of a land earmarked for a park and the allotment, therefore, is contrary to the Master Plan of Delhi, 2001 (hereinafter referred to as MPD 2001, for short). It was submitted that land use from park to any other use cannot be changed without complying with the provisions of Section 11A of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as DD Act, for short).
2. DDA has filed two reply affidavits. In the first affidavit filed on 12th March, 2001, it is stated that the respondent No. 5-Society had made a request for allotment of 500 sq.mts. of land for residential quarters for Service personnel. After due consideration, 500 sq. mts. of land earmarked for "Multi Purpose Community Usage" in the Lay Out Plan was allotted to the respondent No. 5 society. In conjunction with the said allotment, DDA also decided that the balance land earmarked in the Lay Out Plan for "Multi Purpose Community Usage" in the vicinity would be converted to green use and developed as a park. The matter was referred to Ministry of Urban Development for changes in the Lay Out Plan.
3. In the additional affidavit dated 22nd May, 2001 filed by the DDA, it is pointed out that the initial Lay Out Plan was approved/sanctioned by the MCD. At that time, the entire area was under the control of Delhi Administration and subsequently was transferred to DDA. DDA has power to sanction and modify the Lay Out Plan. MCD can also modify the Lay Out Plan of the New Friends Colony with their consent, as DDA is a superior lessor who has executed the lease deed in favour of the Cooperative Society, which in turn has executed sub-leases in favour of their members. In this affidavit it is stated that the Lay Out Plan for New Friends Colony has been checked and a big chunk of land was earmarked for community centre, nursery school and community services. It is further stated that except for 500 sq.mts. of land which has been allotted to respondent No. 5, the entire balance area of land has been converted into green because of lack of demand for allotment of land for these activities.
.4. MCD in their affidavit filed on 9th March, 2001 has stated that DDA vide their letter dated 19th July, 2000 had issued No Objection Certificate for sanction of building plans. DDA had sent a modified copy of the Lay Out Plan for carrying out necessary modification by the town planner, MCD. It is stated that the Lay Out Plan was modified and accorded under Section 313 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1954 (hereinafter referred to as DMC Act, for short). It is stated that sanction of the building plans was according to law and the applicable building bye laws. The building plans were sanctioned as per the provisions of MPD-2001 as applicable for residential buildings. In their second affidavit filed on 18th May, 2001, MCD has reiterated their earlier stand and stated that the Lay Out Plan was modified and the right to modify the Lay Out Plan vests with MCD under Section 313 of DMC Act. It is further stated that use of the land for residence of service personnel is compatible with the use as specified in the Lay Out Plan. 2000 sq.mts. of land as per the earlier Lay Out Plan had been carved out for community facilities including nursery school, and as per MPD, 2001, a nursery school requires an area of 800 sq. mtrs. It is stated that only 500 sq.mts. of land out of the said 2000 sq.mts. was allotted to respondent No. 5 and, therefore, there was still sufficient land for a nursery school. It is stated that MCD was fully aware of the aforesaid facts in
B.U. Block Residents Welfare Association v. DDA 87(2000) DLT 603
G.N. Khajuria v. Delhi Development Authority and Anr. AIR 1996 SC 253
Shanti Devi Gupta v. Delhi Dev. Authority 54 (1994) DLT 620 Del. : AIR 1994 Del. 299
Smt. Maya Devi v. UOI 65 (1997) DLT 405
Triveni Educational & Social Welfare Society v. DDA & Anr. 76 (1998) DLT 329 : 1998 (47) DRJ 249(DB)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.