MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA, SANJIV KHANNA
RAVI KR. MATHUR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
SANJIV KHANNA, J:
1. Mr. R K Mathur and Mr. K L Sharma are members of Rajasthan Higher Judicial Services (hereinafter referred to as RHJS, for short). Both of them were appointed as Presiding Officers of Debt Recovery Tribunal at Delhi. Notifications appointing them as Presiding Officers stipulated that they were appointed for a period of 5 years from the specified dates or till they attained age of 62 years, whichever was earlier.
2. By two separate letters dated 6th July, 2006 and 21st July, 2006, High Court of Rajasthan sought repatriation of Mr. R K Mathur and Mr. K L Sharma, respectively from their posting as Presiding Officers to RHJS. Pursuant to these letters, the Central Government informed the appellants that their posting as Presiding Officers was terminated and they stand repatriated.
3. The appellants challenged their repatriation to RHJS by filing writ petitions. By the impugned judgment dated 7th September, 2006, the writ petitions have been dismissed. Learned Single Judge has held that the appellants had continued to retain their position as Judicial Officers of RHJS and being on deputation, the Rajasthan High Court could have recalled them at any time. It h
Bahadursinh Lakhubhai Gohil v. Jagdishbhai M. Kamalia (2004) 2 SCC 65
Guwahati High Court v. Kuladhar Phukan (2002) 4 SCC 524
L.P. Agarwal v. Union of India (1992) 3 SCC 526
Paresh Chandra Nandi v. Controller of Stores (1970) 3 SCC 870
S.K. Kacker (Dr.) v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences (1996) 10 SCC 734
State of Punjab and Others v. Indersingh and others (1997) 8 SCC 372
Union of India v. Shardindu (2007) 6 SCC 276
Union of India v. V.E. Ramakrishnan (2005) 8 SCC 394
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.