MARKANDEY KATJU, MADAN B.LOKUR
India Tourism Development Corpn Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Poonam Rai – Respondent
Markandeya Katju, C.J.
1. This writ appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment of learned single Judge dated 9.5.2002, Annexure A to the appeal.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3. The facts in detail have been set out in the judgment of the learned single Judge and hence we are not repeating unless where necessary.
4. The respondent (writ petitioner) was appointed on the post of Cashier-cum-Sales Assistant on contract basis in the service of the appellant corporation by order dated 14.1.1994 upto 31.5.1996. Clause 3 of the appointment order states:
"On the expiry of the period of contract, your services shall automatically stand terminated and you shall be deemed to have been relieved."
5. Clause 6 of the appointment order states:
"During the period of contract, your services are liable to be terminated at any time without any notice from either side and without assigning any reason thereof."
6. It is alleged in para 10 of the writ petition that the petitioner discharged her duties without any complaint from anyone and she maintained absolute integrity and efficiency and was obedient, disciplined and diligent. However, to her surprise sh
K.V. Krishnamani v. Lalit Kala Academy 1996 (5) Scale 139
Krishnadevaraya Education Trust & Anr. v. L.A. Balakrishna (2001) 9 SCC 319.
Kunwar Arun Kumar v. UP Hill Electronics Corporation & Ors. 1997 (2) SCC 191
State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. v. Kaushal Kishore Shukla 1991 (1) SCC 691
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.