RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
RAM CHANDER AGGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
UOI – Respondent
RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.
1. These Intra-Court Appeals are preferred impugning the common order dated 19th January, 2012 of the Learned Single Judge dismissing W.P.(C) No. 8065/2011 and W.P.(C) No. 8036/2011 with costs of `50,000/- each, for the reason of the appellants/writ petitioners having suppressed/concealed material facts therefrom. The counsel for the private respondents appeared on caveat and considering the nature of the controversy, we have with consent heard the parties finally.
2. The writ petitions were filed seeking a direction to the Land & Development Office (L&DO) and the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) to hear and decide the statutory revision petitions dated 27th July, 2005 and 18th May, 1994 preferred by the appellants/writ petitioners respectively, under Section 24 of the Displaced Persons (Compensation & Rehabilitation) Act, 1954.
3. The aforesaid revision petitions were filed by the appellants/writ petitioners seeking cancellation/setting aside of the sale certificate dated 17th October, 1963 and other transfer documents in favour of the predecessor-in-interest of the private respondents in respect of shop No.114, New Qutub Road Market
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.