SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Del) 523

SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
Wasim – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:Deepak Vohra, (DHCLSC), Ms. Anita Abraham, Advocates.
For the Respondent: Mukesh Gupta, APP.

Judgment :-

Siddharth Mridul, J.

1. These two appeals are directed against the judgment dated 15.03.2010 passed by the Additional Session Judge, Rohini, in Session Case No: 150/07 arising out of FIR No. 707/07 (Ex.PW-2/A) registered under Sections 394/397/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). Vide the impugned judgment Appellant Wasim (hereinafter referred to as ‘A-1’) has been convicted under Sections 394/397/34 IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. By an order of sentence dated 15.03.2010, for offences under Section 394/397 IPC, A-1 has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.5000/-. In default of payment of fine, A-1 has to undergo 4 month’s simple imprisonment. For offence under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, A-1 has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine of Rs.2000/- has been imposed, in default of payment of which he has to further undergo simple imprisonment for 2 months. The sentences are directed to run concurrently. Appellant Nagender (hereinafter referred to as ‘A-2’) has been convicted under Section 394 read with Section 34 IPC. By sentence order dated 15.03.2010, A-2 has been sentenced to undergo Rigoro





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top