RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
Akhtar Ali – Appellant
Versus
Bimla Devi – Respondent
Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J.
1. The appeal impugns the judgment and decree dated 9th February, 1990 of the Sub Judge, 1st Class, Delhi in Suit No.248/1989 filed by the appellant against the respondents for the relief of specific performance of an Agreement of Sale of immovable property and in the alternative for refund of advance paid with interest and compensation; by the impugned judgment, the appellant/plaintiff has been denied the relief of specific performance and has been granted a decree against the respondents/defendants no.1 to 8 for recovery of Rs.10,000/-with future interest at 12% per annum and proportionate costs.
2. The appellant/plaintiff, on 23rd August, 1983, had instituted the suit from which this appeal arises pleading:-
(a). that the respondents/defendants no.1 to 8 had vide Agreement dated 4th March, 1983 agreed to sell their property No.6777 situated inside Akata Kidara, Bara Hindu Rao, Delhi to the appellant/plaintiff for a total sale consideration of Rs.16,000/-out of which the appellant/plaintiff paid Rs.5,000/- at the time of Agreement to Sell;
(b). that the sale was agreed to be completed by executing the Sale Deed in favour of the appellant/plaintiff
V. Muthusami Vs. Angammal (2002) 3 SCC 316
Vimaleshwar Nagappa Shet Vs. Noor Ahmed Shariff (2011) 12 SCC 658
Satya Jain Vs. Anis Ahmed Rushdie (2013) SCC 131
A.C. Arvlappan Vs. Ahalya Naik (2001) 6 SCC 600
Lourdu Mari David Vs. Louis Chinnaya Arogiaswamy (1996) 5 SCC 589
Lala Durga Prasad Vs. Lala Deep Chand AIR 1954 SC 75
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. Vs. Nanak Builders & Investors Pvt. Ltd. (2013) 5 SCC 397
Man Kaur Vs. Hartar Singh Sangha (2010) 10 SCC 512
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.