SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
Naeem Khan @ Guddu – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Siddharth Mridul, J.
1. Acid attack, especially on women, has seen an alarming growth in India. Acid attack or ‘vitriolage’ is often referred to as a ‘crime of passion’ fuelled by jealousy and revenge. Acid throwing is the easiest way to hurt a woman and often used as a form of revenge on refusal of sexual advances, proposal of marriage and demands of dowry. Perpetrators of acid attacks intend to disfigure and cause extreme physical and mental suffering to victims. The present appeal deals with one such unfortunate and ghastly incident where a girl at tender age of 16 years was brutally attacked by acid.
2. By way of the present appeal, the accused Naeem Khan @ Guddu impugns the judgment dated 24.08.2009 passed in Sessions Case No. 28/09 arising out of FIR No.74/2005 whereby the appellant along with co-accused Rakhi has been convicted under Section 307 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860(IPC). By an order on sentence dated 15.09.2009, for offence under Section 307 IPC the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.75,000/-. In default of payment of fine, he has to undergo simple imprisonment for one year. F
State of M.P. v. Mansingh, (2003) 10 SCC 414
Ramlagan Singh v. State of Bihar [(1973) 3 SCC 881: 1973 SCC (Cri) 563: AIR 1972 SC 2593]
Malkhan Singh v. State of U.P. [(1975) 3 SCC 311 : 1974 SCC (Cri) 919: AIR 1975 SC 12]
Machhi Singh v. State of Punjab [(1983) 3 SCC 470: 1983 SCC (Cri) 681]
Appabhai v. State of Gujarat [1988 Supp SCC 241: 1988 SCC (Cri) 559: AIR 1988 SC 696]
Bonkya v. State of Maharashtra [(1995) 6 SCC 447: 1995 SCC (Cri) 1113]
Bhag Singh [(1997) 7 SCC 712: 1997 SCC (Cri) 1163]
Mohar v. State of U.P. [(2002) 7 SCC 606: 2003 SCC (Cri) 121] (SCC p. 606b-c)
Dinesh Kumar v. State of Rajasthan [(2008) 8 SCC 270: (2008) 3 SCC (Cri) 472]
Vishnu v. State of Rajasthan [(2009) 10 SCC 477 : (2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 302]
AnnareddySambasiva Reddy v. State of A.P. [(2009) 12 SCC 546 : (2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 630]
Balraje v. State of Maharashtra [(2010) 6 SCC 673 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 211].
Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab [(2009) 9 SCC 719 : (2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 107]
State of U.P. v. Kishan Chand [(2004) 7 SCC 629 : 2004 SCC (Cri) 2021]
Krishan v. State of Haryana [(2006) 12 SCC 459 : (2007) 2 SCC (Cri) 214]
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Naresh
(Vide Jarnail Singh v. State of Punjab [(2009) 9 SCC 719:(2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 107]
Balraje v. State of Maharashtra [(2010) 6 SCC 673 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 211]
Abdul Sayeed v. State of M.P. [(2010) 10 SCC 259 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 1262]
Narayan Chetanram Chaudhary v. State of Maharashtra
State of H.P. v. Lekh Raj [(2000) 1 SCC 247 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 147 : (1999) 9 ST 155]
Ousu Varghese v. State of Kerala [(1974) 3 SCC 767: 1974 SCC (Cri) 243]
State of Rajasthan v. Kalki [(1981) 2 SCC 752 : 1981 SCC (Cri) 593]
State of U.P. v. M.K. Anthony [(1985) 1 SCC 505: 1985 SCC (Cri) 105 : AIR 1985 SC 48]
Tahsildar Singh v. State of U.P. [AIR 1959 SC 1012 : 1959 Cri LJ 1231]
Rammi v. State of M.P. [(1999) 8 SCC 649: JT (1999) 7 SC 247]
Leela Ram v. State of Haryana [(1999) 9 SCC 525 : JT (1999) 8 SC 274]
State v. Saravanan [(2008) 17 SCC 587 : (2010) 4 SCC (Cri) 580 : AIR 2009 SC 152
Arumugam v. State [(2008) 15 SCC 590 : (2009) 3 SCC (Cri) 1130 : AIR 2009 SC 331]
MahendraPratap Singh v. State of U.P. [(2009) 11 SCC 334 : (2009) 3 SCC (Cri) 1352]
Vijay v. State of M.P. [(2010) 8 SCC 191 : (2010) 3 SCC (Cri) 639]
State of U.P. v. Naresh [(2011) 4 SCC 324 : (2011) 2 SCC (Cri) 216]
BrahmSwaroop v. State of U.P. [(2011) 6 SCC 288 : AIR 2011 SC 280]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.