SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Del) 146

V.K.JAIN
P. C. Mishra – Appellant
Versus
CBI – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant: In Person.
For the Respondent:Narender Mann, SPP Manoj Pant, Advocate, CBI.

Judgment :

V.K. Jain, J.

1. The appellant/ applicant before this Court was convicted under Section 7 & 13 (1) (d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and was sentenced to undergo RI for two (2) years each on each count and was also sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- each or to undergo SI for two (2 ) months each in default. The sentence awarded to the appellant has been suspended vide order dated 23.9.2010. Now this application has been filed by him seeking suspension of the conviction, primarily on the ground that the after retiring from service on 30.6.2010, he has not been able to join any employment due to his conviction though he is a senior citizen having a wife and a divorcee daughter besides aged parents, to be maintained by him.

2. The application has been opposed by the respondent – CBI stating therein that the appellant/ applicant was working as Assistant Commissioner, Sales Tax, when he demanded a sum of Rs.4,000/- as bribe from the complainant for passing an order in his favour was caught red - handed, having accepted the said bribe. The respondent in its reply placed reliance upon the decision of the Apex


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top