VIPIN SANGHI
KOMAL NAGPAL – Appellant
Versus
KAMAL NAGPAL – Respondent
VIPIN SANGHI, J.
1. The petitioners had instituted CS(OS) 2388/06 against three defendants, defendant no.1 being respondent no.1 herein, seeking permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from disposing of the premises known as Carlton cafe,1282-1286, Bada Bazar, Kashmere Gate, New Delhi, without the consent, knowledge & participation of the petitioners. The said suit is still pending adjudication before this Court.
2. The case of the petitioners is that premises known as Carlton cafe is a tenanted premise wherefrom the business under the name and style of M/s Carlton cafe was run by the father of respondent no.1 and his brother. Respondent no.1 had inherited from his father, 25% interest in the tenancy rights of the said premises. It was agreed between petitioner no. 1 & respondent no.1, by way of a family settlement dated 18.11.94, that out of respondent no.1's interest in the said premises, 10% would belong to petitioner no.2, 40% to petitioner no.3 and the remaining 50% to respondent no.1, and that in case of sale of the said interest, the sale proceeds would be shared among petitioner no.2, petitioner no.3 and respondent no.1 in the aforementioned proportion. In
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.