High Court of Delhi
GITA MITTAL & J.R. MIDHA, JJ.
State & Others
Versus
Jagtar & Others
Death Sentence Reference No. 5 of 2010, Crl.A. Nos. 979 of 2008, 1087 of 2010 & 1301 of 2010
Decided On: 01-08-2014
The plea of juvenility can be raised for the first time at the appellate stage. The High Court has the power to order the removal of the disqualification attaching to the conviction.
Fact of the Case:
In a series of appeals against convictions and sentences awarded by session's court, the convicts, as appellants, raised a plea of juvenility which if supported by the inquiry in this regard, has been accepted by the court.
Finding of the Court:
1. The plea of juvenility can be raised for the first time at the appellate stage. 2. The High Court has the power to order the removal of the disqualification attaching to the conviction.
Issues: 1. Whether a person who was juvenile on the date of commission of the offence, prior to the commencement of the 2000 Act, was entitled to the benefit under the Act of 2000. 2. Whether a plea of juvenility on the date of offence accepted at appellate stage is status of appeal against conviction. 3. Whether the High Court (or the appellate/revisional court) itself can order removal of the disqualification attached to the conviction by the trial court, without referring the matter to the Board?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The plea of juvenility can be raised for the first time at the appellate stage. 2. The High Court has the power to order the removal of the disqualification attaching to the conviction.
Final Decision: The plea of juvenility can be raised for the first time at the appellate stage. The High Court has the power to order the removal of the disqualification attaching to the conviction.
Gita Mittal, J.
1. A question stands raised before this court that is, if a plea of juvenility of the convict, raised for the first time at the appellate stage in the High Court, is accepted, what happens to his appeal against the conviction? Consequently, another issue follows. Does the Appellate Court have the power to order the removal of the disqualification attaching to the conviction? In other words, what is the fate of the conviction and the order on the sentence which stands imposed upon such a person?
2. This plea was raised by one or more of the appellants in the above appeals. We have therefore heard learned counsels in the appeals on these two issues.
I. Statutory Framework
3. So far as the issues at hand are concerned, it would be useful to first and foremost set out, in extenso, the provisions of Section 2(k), 2l, 6, 7, 19, 20 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter the “JJ Act”) as well as Rule 3(IX) and (XIV) of Chapter II of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Rules of 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”). The same read as hereunder :-
“2(k) "juvenile" or "child" means a person who has not completed eighteenth year of age;
"juvenile in conflict with law" means a juvenile who is alleged to have committed an offence;
6. Powers of Juvenile Justice Board.-
(1) Where a Board has been constituted for any district or a group of districts, such Board shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force but save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, have power to deal exclusively with all proceedings under this Act relating to juvenile in conflict with law.
(2) The powers conferred on the Board by or under this Act may also be exercised by the High Court and the Court of Session, when the proceeding comes before them in appeal, revision or otherwise.
7. Procedure to be followed by a Magistrate not empowered under the Act.- Procedure to be followed by a Magistrate not empowered under the Act.-
(1) When any Magistrate not empowered to exercise the powers of a Board under this Act is of the opinion that a person brought before him under any of the provisions of this Act (other than for the purpose of giving evidence), is a juvenile or the child, he shall without any delay record such opinion and forward the juvenile or the child and the record of the proceeding to the competent authority having jurisdiction over the proceeding.
(2) The competent authority to which the proceeding is forwarded under sub-section (1) shall hold the inquiry as if the juvenile or the child had originally been brought before it.
7A. Procedure to be followed when claim of juvenility is raised before any court. –
(1) Whenever a claim of juvenility is raised before any court or a court is of the opinion that an accused person was a juvenile on the date of commission of the offence, the court shall make an inquiry, take such evidence as may be necessary (but not an affidavit) so as to determine the age of such person, and shall record a finding whether the person is a juvenile or a child or not, stating his age as nearly as may be:
Provided that a claim of juvenility may be raised before any court and it shall be recognized at any stage, even after final disposal of the case, and such claim shall be determined in terms of the provisions contained in this Act and the rules made thereunder, even if the juvenile has ceased to be so on or before the date of commencement of this Act.
(2) If the court finds a person to be juvenile on the date of commission of the offence under sub-section (1), it shall forward the juvenile to the Board for passing appropriate orders and the sentence, if any, passed by the court shall be deemed to have no effect.”
4. How the Juvenile Justice Board is to proceed against the juvenile and what are the possible orders which may be passed on finding him guilty of commission of offences is prescribed under Section 1
(1981) 4 SCC 149 Jayendra & Anr. V. State of U.P
Jayendra v. State of U.P. (1981) 4 SCC 149 : 1982 Cri LJ 1000
(2005) 12 SCC 615 Gurpreet Singh vs. State of Punjab and the connected appeal
(2010) 5 SCC 344 Dharambir v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
(2012) 8 SCC 800 Babla @ Dinesh v. State of Uttrakhand
(2012) 8 SCC 763 Vijay Singh v. State of Delhi
(1981) 4 SCC 210 Raghbir v. State of Haryana
(2009) 17 SCC 574 Rambir Singh & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
(2012) 8 SCC 34 Kalu @ Amit v. State of Haryana
Hari Ram v. State of Rajasthan [(2009) 13 SCC 211 : (2010) 1 SCC (Cri) 987] (SCC p. 223
(2011) 2 SCC 251 Lakhan Lal v. State of Bihar
Umesh Singh v. State of Bihar [(2000) 6 SCC 89 : 2000 SCC (Cri) 1026]
Bhola Bhagat v. State of Bihar [(1997) 8 SCC 720 : 1998 SCC (Cri) 125]
Bhoop Ram v. State of U.P. [(1989) 3 SCC 1 : 1989 SCC (Cri) 486]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.