SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 182

BADAR DURREZ AHMED, SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Rajni Jain – Appellant
Versus
Parag Jain – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants:K.K. Rai, Senior Advocate with P.K. Mishra, Advocate.

Judgment

Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.

1. The Appellants have filed the present appeal impugning the order dated 17.11.2014 whereby the application of the Appellants under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for rejection of the plaint has been dismissed.

2. The Respondent (Plaintiff) before the trial court filed a suit for specific performance, declaration, mandatory and permanent injunction in respect of property E-142, Preet Vihar, Delhi-92.

3. It is contended by the Respondent (Plaintiff) in the Plaint, that the Appellant No. 1 (Defendant No. 1) is the owner of the suit property and the Appellants (Defendant Nos. 1 and 2) had approached the Respondent through a property dealer for sale of the said property.

4. It is contended that an Agreement to Sell was executed between the parties on 08.02.2013 for a total sale consideration of Rs. 3,15,00,000/-. Rs.35,00,000/- in cash and Rs.25,00,000/- by cheque was also handed over by the Respondent to the Appellants at the time of execution of the Agreement to Sell. As per the Respondent, another payment of Rs.65,00,000/- was to be made on or before 17.02.2013 and the balance sale consideration of Rs.1,90,00,000/- was to be paid by














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top