BADAR DURREZ AHMED, SANJEEV SACHDEVA
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.
Prayers in brief:
1. Out of these six writ petitions, three have been filed by Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd and three have been filed by Volkswagen India Pvt Ltd. Initially, WP(C) 3022/2014 and WP(C) 3023/2014 were filed by the said petitioners, respectively. In those writ petitions the main prayers were for terminating the anti-dumping investigation in relation to imports of Cast Aluminium Alloy Wheels originating in or exported from China PR, Korea RP and Thailand and for setting aside the Preliminary Finding dated 13.01.2013 and the impugned Antidumping Duty Notification No.15/2014-Customs (ADD) dated 11.04.2014. Then, WP(C) 3250/2014 and WP(C) 3251/2014 were filed (one each) by the said petitioners, inter alia, seeking the quashing of the Notice bearing F.No.354/241/2012-TRU dated 30.04.2014 and the letter bearing F.No.14/7/2012- DGAD dated 08.05.2014. Finally, WP(C) 633/2015 and WP(C) 634/2015 were filed (one each) by the said petitioners, inter alia, praying for the setting aside of WP (C) Nos. 3022/14, 3023/14, 3250/14, 3251/14, 633/15 & 634/15 Page 4 of 29 the Final Finding No.14/7/2012-DGAD dated 09.06.2014 of the Designated Authority.
Points fo
Babu Verghese & Others v. Bar Council of Kerala & Others
Designated Authority (Anti-Dumping Directorate), Ministry of Commerce v. Haldor Topsoe A/S
Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Designated Authority
Automotive Tyre Manufacturers Association v. the Designated Authority & Others
Swadeshi Cotton Mills v. Union of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.