Kailash Gambhir, J.

1. Challenge in the present appeals is to the order dated 11.09.2014 passed by learned Single Judge whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the applications preferred by the appellants under Order IX Rule 13 CPC. Since the appeals are filed against the common order, therefore the same are being heard and disposed of by this common order.

2. Mr. J.K. Singh, the learned counsel for the appellants at the very outset seeks modification of the order dated 24.02.2015, limited to the extent that in the said order the Court has not recorded the fact that the statement given by the learned counsel stating that he will confine his arguments to assail the order under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC was on instructions from Mohd. Waris, the authorised representative.

3. The modification sought for is innocuous in nature, therefore, the same is allowed and the order dated 24.02.2015 is modified, limited to the extent of incorporating the fact, that the submission made by Mr. J.K. Singh, Advocate, was on the instructions received by him from Mohd. Waris – authorised representative of the appellant Company.

4. Brief facts relevant for deciding the present appeals in