HIMA KOHLI
ALKA KASANA – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY – Respondent
HIMA KOHLI, J.
I.A. 22875/2014 (by the defendant u/O VII R 11 CPC)
1. The present application has been filed by the defendant/IIT Delhi under Order VII Rule 11 CPC praying inter alia that the suit be rejected on the ground that the same is barred by limitation.
2. The plaintiff, who was admitted in the defendant/Institute in the year 2010, as a student of M.Tech. (Laboratory Science Course), has instituted the present suit against the defendant/IIT, claiming damages of Rs.50 lacs alongwith interest on account of 100% loss of vision with sustained chemical burn injuries suffered by her during the practicals held in the chemistry laboratory and attributed to the defendant on account of their alleged negligence when an explosion had taken place in the Institute’s premises on 27.06.2011.
3. The only plea raised by the learned counsel for the defendant for seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is that the suit is barred by limitation for the reason that the plaintiff is asking for compensation in respect of an accident that had occurred on 27.06.2011 and the period of limitation for instituting a suit as prescribed under the Limitation Act, 1963 is three
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.