SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 1184

J.R.MIDHA
Suraj Verma – Appellant
Versus
Delhi Development Authority – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Pankaj Sinha and Ms. Noopur Dubey, Advocates
Mr. Arjun Pant, Advocate

Judgment

1. The learned Trial Court has passed a decree of Rs.8,00,000/- along with interest @ 6% per annum which is under challenge in his appeal by both the parties. The appellant in RFA No.299/2011 is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the learned Trial Court whereas the appellant in RFA No.307/2011 is seeking reduction of the compensation amount. For the sake of convenience, the appellant in RFA No.299/2011 is referred to as “plaintiff” whereas the appellant in appeal No.307/2011 is referred to as the “defendant” as per their ranks before the learned Trial Court.

2. On 15th August, 1993, the plaintiff’s minor son, Master Merka Verma aged about six years suddenly disappeared. The plaintiff reported the matter to the Police whereupon a DD entry was registered and efforts were made to search the plaintiff’s son.

3. On 17th August, 1993, the dead body of plaintiff’s son was found floating in the water accumulated in the pit around the manhole built by the defendant. On 17th August, 1993, the Police registered FIR No.193/93 against the Executive Engineer of the re
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top