S.P.GOYAL, S.S.SANDHAWALIA, S.C.MITAL, D.B.LAL, HARBANS LAL
Lachhman Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurmit Kaur – Respondent
HARBANS LAL, J.
1. The subject matter of the present reference is important but quite baffling a question, as to how the damages should be quantified which the offender, who is held responsible for terminating prematurely the life of another person by this culpable act, negligence or default is liable to pay to the legal representatives or the dependants of the deceased or, in other words, the determination of the amount of compensation which the legal representatives or dependants are entitled to get from such offender.
2. The injured person, who was the victim of any injury at the hands of another person which resulted in permanent or temporary incapacity causing thereby some loss of earning, has always been held to be entitled to get damages against the offender under the law of torts, but there was no specific provision for getting damages before 1855 in India if such injury resulted in the death of the injured person, nor was there any legal provision as to who will be entitled to get the damages or the compensation in such a contingency. The Indian Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (hereinafter to be called the Act), for the first time provided for such damages or compensatio
The Vanguard Insurance Co. Ltd. V/s. Smt. Naresh Kanta
Gobald Motor Service Ltd. V/s. R.M.K. Veluswamy
Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Bairagarh V/s. Sudhakaran
Sheikhupura Transport Co. Ltd. V/s. Northern India Transporters Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Municipal Corporation Of Delhi V/s. Subhagwanti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.