SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(P&H) 152

S.P.GOYAL, S.S.SANDHAWALIA, S.C.MITAL, D.B.LAL, HARBANS LAL
Lachhman Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gurmit Kaur – Respondent


Judgment

HARBANS LAL, J.

1. The subject matter of the present reference is important but quite baffling a question, as to how the damages should be quantified which the offender, who is held responsible for terminating prematurely the life of another person by this culpable act, negligence or default is liable to pay to the legal representatives or the dependants of the deceased or, in other words, the determination of the amount of compensation which the legal representatives or dependants are entitled to get from such offender.

2. The injured person, who was the victim of any injury at the hands of another person which resulted in permanent or temporary incapacity causing thereby some loss of earning, has always been held to be entitled to get damages against the offender under the law of torts, but there was no specific provision for getting damages before 1855 in India if such injury resulted in the death of the injured person, nor was there any legal provision as to who will be entitled to get the damages or the compensation in such a contingency. The Indian Fatal Accidents Act, 1855 (hereinafter to be called the Act), for the first time provided for such damages or compensatio

















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top