SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Del) 1699

HIMA KOHLI
FRESH ASSETS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
D. D. A0 – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Anil K. Khaware, Advocate
Mr. Dhanesh Relan, Advocate with Mr. Arush Bhandari, Advocate for D-1/DDA
Mr. Dev P. Bhardwaj, CGSC for D-2/UOI

JUDGMENT :

HIMA KOHLI, J.

I.A. 24684/2014 (by D-1/DDA under Order VII Rule 11 CPC)

1. The present application has been filed by the defendant No.1/DDA praying inter alia that the suit instituted by the plaintiff/ company for recovery of a sum of Rs.46,85,671/- towards interest on the principal amount of Rs.63,12,500/- retained by the DDA between 07.12.2008 till 29.01.2013, alongwith future interest @18% per annum thereon, is liable to be rejected, being barred under Section 53B of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’).

2. The relevant facts for determining the controversy raised in the present application are that in the year 2008, the defendant No.1/DDA had issued an advertisement for auctioning a plot bearing No.4, near plot No.A-373, Defence Colony, New Delhi, measuring 91 sq. meters. The plaintiff/company had participated in the auction held for the subject plot on 17.12.2008. The reserve price of the subject plot was fixed by the defendant no. 1/DDA as Rs.1,29,90,614/-. The plaintiff/company was declared as the highest bidder at Rs.2,52,50,000/



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top