ASHUTOSH KUMAR
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF NCT DELHI – Respondent
ASHUTOSH KUMAR, J.
1. The petitioners, who are the parents in law of the complainant Vandana Jain, have challenged the order dated 09.01.2015 whereby the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Mahila Courts-02, Dwarka Courts, Delhi has refused to discharge them with respect to offence under Section 498A of the IPC in connection with FIR No.55/11 (P.S.Dabri).
2. The complainant Vandana Jain had lodged an FIR alleging that she got married to one Nitin Jain, son of the petitioners on 03.03.2009 in accordance with Hindu rites and rituals at Delhi. At the time of marriage, tall claims were made by the accused persons regarding their financial strength and status in society but those claims were shortly found to be false. It was alleged that after the marriage, the accused persons insinuated the complainant of bringing insufficient dowry and she was asked to hand over all the personal jewellery. The husband of the complainant was working at Nigeria. The petitioner No.1 was alleged to have behaved in a strange fashion and occasionally displayed abusive behavior as against the complainant. Petitioner No.2, the mother-in-law of the complainant taunted her for bringing less dowry and ask
Sarah Mathew vs. Institute of Cardio Vascular Diseases by its Director and Ors
Bharat Damodar Kale vs. State of A.P (2003) 8 SCC 559
Onkar Nath Mishra vs. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
State of Karnataka v. L. Muniswamy
State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. Som Nath Thapa and Ors. 1996 (4) SCC 659
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.