SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 66

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH CHANDRA – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. R.P. Vats, Advocate.
Mrs. Mridula Ray, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

1. This appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugns the judgment dated 21st October, 2008 of the Court of Sh. Rajiv Mehra, Additional District Judge (ADJ), Delhi decreeing Suit No. 51 of 2004 filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellant/defendant State Bank of India (SBI) in the sum of Rs. 17,19,796/- along with interest pendente lite and future till realisation of the amount at the rate of 12% per annum along with cost of the suit.

2. Notice of the appeal was issued and vide ex-parte ad-interim order dated 30th March, 2009, subject to the appellant/defendant SBI depositing the principal amount in the form of Fixed Deposit Receipt (FDR), execution of the impugned judgment and decree was stayed.

3. Thereafter, vide order dated 11th May, 2009 the appeal was admitted for hearing and Trial Court record requisitioned. On the application of the respondent/plaintiff for early hearing, vide order dated 23rd September, 2015, the appeal was taken out of the category of Regulars and ordered to be listed today for







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top