Anil Kumar, J.—

1. The appellants have challenged their conviction in Sessions Case No.466 of 2006, titled as State v. Vinay Kumar & Anr., arising from the FIR No.528 of 2002, under Sections 302/449/376/411/ Indian Penal Code, PS Rohini convicting the appellant Vinay Kumar under Sections 120-B, 449/120-B, 376, 302/120-B of the Indian Penal Code and appellant Munish Kumar under sections 120-B, 449/120-B and 302/120-B of the IPC by judgment dated 7th September, 2007 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Delhi. The appellant Vinay Kumar was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.2000/- and in default of payment of fine further rigorous imprisonment for two months for offence under Section 120-B IPC; rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.2000/- and in default rigorous imprisonment for two more months for offence under Section 449/120-B of IPC and imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.2000/- and in default further rigorous imprisonment of two months for offence under Section 376 IPC and imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.2000/- and in default rigorous imprisonment for two months for offence under Section 302/120-B of IPC. Appella