PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, MUKTA GUPTA
SWARAJ KISHORE ARORA – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN BANK – Respondent
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.
1. A common question of law concerning the power of the Recovery Officer, while executing orders passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal under Section 19 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) wherein the bank or a financial institution has obtained a right to recover the debt, as determined by the Debts Recovery Tribunal from the borrower and the guarantors, to proceed against a property held to be mortgaged with the bank or the financial institution to which objections are filed by third parties, claiming an interest in the property, arise for consideration in the above captioned writ petitions and therefore though the factual matrix of the four writ petitions are slightly different they are being decided by a singular order.
2. The above captioned writ petitions relate to different floors of the same building built on plot bearing municipal No.7/3 Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi.
3. The admitted position concerning the building on plot bearing municipal No.7/3 Old Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi is, that the Government of India, through the Land and Development Office, granted perpetual l
Asha M. Jain Vs. Canara Bank & Ors.
M.C. Chockalingam & Ors. Vs. V. Manickavasagam & Ors.
Batra Vs. Laxmi Insurance Company Ltd.
Thomson Press (India) Ltd. Vs. Nanak Builders and Investors Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Surjeet Singh Vs. Harbans Singh & Ors.
Mulraj Vs. Murti Raghunathji Maharaj
Brig. K.K. Verma and Anr. Vs. UOI and Anr.
Lallu Yeshwant Singh Vs. Rao Jagdish Singh and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.