S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.

1. The appellants in these two proceedings are aggrieved by a judgment of a learned Single Judge decreeing the respondents’ suit. The appellants in RFA 117/2015 were arrayed as Defendant Nos. 3 to 6 (hereafter referred to as "Chopras"). They appeal the judgment and decree of a learned Single Judge, allowing a suit for declaration and possession, filed by the first two respondents (hereafter variously "the plaintiffs" or "the Khannas"). The first defendant (“Rajiv” hereafter) is arrayed as the third respondent; the fourth respondent was the second defendant, (referred to hereafter as "Judge Chawla"). Rajiv, in RFA 21/2016, appeals the same decree, to the extent it directs him to pay mesne profits.

2. The Khannas had filed a suit before the Additional District Judge under Sections 5 and 6 of Specific Relief Act contending that in furtherance to a sale transaction with Judge Chawla, (a General Power of Attorney holder of Rajiv), they became owners of property No. 8/289, Sunder Vihar, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi ("suit property") after payment of full sale consideration and execution of Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney (GPA) and Special Power of At