SIDDHARTH MRIDUL
RAM KUMAR SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
M. C. GUPTA – Respondent
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
1. The present Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) impugns the judgment and decree dated 9th May, 2016 passed by the learned ADJ, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Civil Suit No. 508/15 titled M.C. Gupta vs. Ram Kumar Sharma filed by the respondent/plaintiff [respondent herein] for recovery of possession, damages, pendente lite and future interest with cost, whereby the application of the respondent under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code was allowed and the appellant/defendant [appellant herein] was directed to hand over possession of the suit property bearing house no. 135, Ground Floor, Surya Niketan, Delhi, (subject premises) alongwith costs to the respondent. The appellant was further directed to pay damages @ Rs. 18,000/- per month along with 10% interest from the month of May, 2016 till the handing over of the vacant possession of the subject premises.
2. For the purposes of adjudicating the present appeal, it would be relevant to elaborate on certain admitted facts in the said Suit No. 508/15 (‘said Suit’). They are as follows:-
(i) The respondent/landlord ins
Atma Ram Properties Pvt. Ltd. vs. Pal Properties Pvt. and Ors. 2002 (62) DRJ 623
Karam Kapahi and Others vs. Lal Chand Public Charitable Trust and Another
Punjab National Bank vs. Virendra Prakash & Anr. 188 (2012) DLT 48
Raveesh Chand Jain vs. Raj Rani Jain reported as (2015) 8 SCC 428
Sky Land International Pvt. Ltd. vs. Kavita P. Lalwani 191 (2012) DLT 594
Uttam Singh Duggal & Co. Ltd. vs. United Bank of India reported as (2000) 7 SCC 120
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.