RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
ANURADHA SINGH – Respondent
1. This first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 impugns the judgment and decree dated 9th September, 2013 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-1 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi of dismissal of Suit No. 232/2013 filed by the appellant/plaintiff on 23rd May, 2011 for recovery of Rs. 18,28,957.70 paise from the respondent/defendant.
2. It is the case of the appellant/plaintiff (i) that he is the partner of the firm known under the name and style of M/s Home Concepts; (ii) that the said firm M/s Home Concepts has been doing the business of manufacturing and exporting the home furnishings and made ups; (iii) that a copy of the Partnership Deed is filed along with the plaint; (iv) that in the year 2003, the respondent/defendant approached the appellant/plaintiff at the business place with foreign buyers; (v) that the respondent/defendant is the commission agent between the appellant/plaintiff and his buyers; (vi) that it was decided between the appellant/plaintiff and the respondent/defendant that the respondent/defendant will provide buyers to the appellant/plaintiff and the respondent/defendant will charge commission @ 5% on total sale f
State Bank of India Vs. Rajesh Chandra 227 (2016) DLT 110
M/s Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. Vs. Ganesh Property (1998) 7 SCC 184
Shreeram Finance Corporation Vs. Yasin Khan (1989) 3 SCR 484
M/s. Haldiram Bhujiawala Vs. M/s Anand Kumar Deepak Kumar (2000) 3 SCC 250
Purushottam Vs. Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (2007) 15 SCC 58
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.