SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Del) 2505

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
ANIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
ANURADHA SINGH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. Vijay K. Gupta & Mr. Mehul Gupta, Advs.

JUDGMENT :

1. This first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 impugns the judgment and decree dated 9th September, 2013 of the Court of Additional District Judge (ADJ)-1 (South), Saket Courts, New Delhi of dismissal of Suit No. 232/2013 filed by the appellant/plaintiff on 23rd May, 2011 for recovery of Rs. 18,28,957.70 paise from the respondent/defendant.

2. It is the case of the appellant/plaintiff (i) that he is the partner of the firm known under the name and style of M/s Home Concepts; (ii) that the said firm M/s Home Concepts has been doing the business of manufacturing and exporting the home furnishings and made ups; (iii) that a copy of the Partnership Deed is filed along with the plaint; (iv) that in the year 2003, the respondent/defendant approached the appellant/plaintiff at the business place with foreign buyers; (v) that the respondent/defendant is the commission agent between the appellant/plaintiff and his buyers; (vi) that it was decided between the appellant/plaintiff and the respondent/defendant that the respondent/defendant will provide buyers to the appellant/plaintiff and the respondent/defendant will charge commission @ 5% on total sale f








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top