IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MUKTA GUPTA, J.
Smt. Lavanya Anirudh Verma - Petitioner
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
CRL.M.C. 301 of 2017
Decided On : 08-02-2017
Guardian - Appointment of Guardian for Minor - Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 - Section 2(31), Section 3, Section 29(1), Section 30(vi) - The court discussed the appointment of a guardian for a minor under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and the interpretation of the term 'guardian' as per the Act. It highlighted the conscious deletion of the words 'before that authority' from the definition of 'guardian' and emphasized the principles of participation, best interest, and natural justice to be followed in such cases.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought setting aside of orders dismissing the application for inspection of records filed on behalf of a minor girl who was found abandoned and sexually assaulted by her father. The Child Welfare Committee appointed the petitioner as the guardian of the minor, but the application for inspection was dismissed by the court.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the appointment of the petitioner as the guardian was valid under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015. It criticized the court for not appointing a guardian ad litem and failing to comply with the guidelines for legal representation of child victims.
Issues: The issues revolved around the interpretation of the term 'guardian' under the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, and the court's obligation to ensure legal representation and protection of child victims.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the conscious deletion of the words 'before that authority' from the definition of 'guardian' and the principles of participation, best interest, and natural justice to be followed in cases involving child victims.
Final Decision: The impugned orders were set aside, and the Director of Samarpan Homes for Girls was appointed as the guardian ad litem for the child victim, with a directive to ensure the best interest of the child.
Mukta Gupta, J.
1. By this application, the petitioner seeks setting aside of orders dated 21st December, 2016 and 26th October, 2016 whereby the application for inspection of records filed by the petitioner on behalf of Minor ‘X’ was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner has no locus standi to make such application and inspect the records.
2. A brief exposition of facts is that on 12th April, 2016, Minor ‘X’, a girl aged 12 years and her brother aged 9 years, were found abandoned at K Block Park, Dakshinpuri, Delhi by the officers of P.S. Ambedkar Nagar, who handed over the two children to Child Welfare Officer, Foundling Home - Welfare Home for Children, for immediate care and protection. On 13th April, 2016, Minor ‘X’ and her brother were counselled by the Child Welfare Officer when they stated that they had left the home voluntarily as their father had been sexually assaulting Minor ‘X’ and was also physically violent with both of them. Their mother had abandoned them three years back and had married another man. They stated that they did not wish to return home to their father. The Child Welfare Officer filed a report before the Child Welfare Committee (CWC). On the same day, Chairman, CWC directed short term placement of Minor ‘X’ and her brother at Foundling Home - Welfare Home for Children. On 18th April, 2016, FIR No. 234/2016 was registered for the offences punishable under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (in short POCSO) at PS Ambedkar Nagar at the instance of Minor ‘X’ against her father, whereafter statement of Minor ‘X’ was also recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
3. On 2nd May, 2016, CWC passed an order transferring Minor ‘X’ to "Global Home" for further rehabilitation. Thereafter, on 25th May, 2016, another order was passed by CWC whereby Minor ‘X’ was transferred to "Samarpan Home for Girls". CWC on 26th September, 2016 passed an order directing that Minor ‘X’ shall remain in the long term care and custody of "Samarpan Home for Girls" till 25th September, 2017. On 24th October, 2016, an application was filed by the petitioner for inspection of records which was dismissed on 26th October, 2016. In view of the aforesaid order, an application was made to CWC to appoint the petitioner as the guardian of Minor ‘X’ in terms of Section 2(31) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 (in short ‘JJ Act, 2015’). On 9th November, 2016, CWC while exercising its powers under Section 29(1) and in furtherance of its responsibilities under Section 30(vi) of the JJ Act, 2015, appointed the petitioner as the guardian of Minor ‘X’. The order dated 9th November, 2016 passed by CWC is as under:-
“Minor X (name deleted), aged 13 years, with case no. 365/16, has been found to be in need of care of protection due to sexual abuse by her father on many occasions. The child finally ran away from her home along with her brother and was found by a lady who came to their help and informed the police.
The child's case was registered under FIR no. 234/16 dated 18.04.2016 u/s IPC 376 and Section 6 of the POCSO Act (hereinafter "the Proceedings").
It has been found that the child's guardian is the accused in the case and the mother has left them and remarried and hence not a fit person to provide care and protection to the child.
By section 30(vi) read with section 2(31) of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015, this Committee is charged with the responsibility of ensuring care, protection, appropriate rehabilitation or restoration of children in need of care and protection, based on the child's individual care plan and passing necessary directions to parents or guardians or fit persons or children's homes or fit facility in this regard.
In exercise of the said power, the Child Welfare Committee hereby appoints the Director of Samarpan Home for Girls, located at B-24, Maharani Bagh, Back Lane, New Delhi - 110065, who has the custody and charge of the child, as the "Guardian" of the child during the course o
Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Delhi Domestic Working Women Forum v. Union of India
D.R. Fraser & Co. Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Lalu Prasad Yadav & Anr. Vs. State of Bihar & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.