SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.N. Venkatachaliah, C.J.I., S.Mohan and S.B. Majumdar, JJ.
Delhi Domestic Working Womens Forum - petitioner
versus
Union of India & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (Cri.) No. 362 of 1993
Decided on 19.10.1994
Held,
1) The complainants of sexual assault cases should be provided with legal representation. It is important to have some one who is well-acquainted with the criminal justice system. The role of the victims advocate would not only be to explain to the victim the nature of the proceedings, to prepare her for the case and to assist her in the police station and in Court but to provide her with guidance as to how she might obtain help of a different nature from other agencies, for example, mind counseling or medical assistance. It is important to secure continuity of assistance by ensuring that the same person who looked after the complainants interests in the police station represent her till the end of the case.
2) Legal assistance will have to be provided at the police station since the victim of sexual assault might very well be in a distressed state upon arrival at the police station, the guidance and support of a lawyer at this stage and whilst she was being questioned would be of great assistance to her.
3) The police should be under a duty to inform the victim of her right to representation before any questions were asked of her and that the police report should stage that the victim was so in formed.
4) A list of advocates willing to act in these cases should be kept at the police station for victims who did not have a particular lawyer in mind or whose own lawyer was unavailable.
5) The advocate shall be appointed by the court, upon application by the police at the earliest convenient moment, but in order to ensure that victims were questioned without undue delay, advocates would be authorised to act at the police station before leave of the Court was sought or obtained.
6) In all rape trials anonymity of the victim must be maintained, as far as necessary.
7) It is necessary, having regard to the Directive Principles contained under Article 38(1) of the Constitution of India to set up Criminal Injuries Compensation Board. Rape victims frequently incur substantial financial loss. Some, for example, are too traumatised to continue in employment.
8) Compensation for victims shall be awarded by the Court on conviction of the offender any by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Board whether or not a conviction has taken place. The Board will take into account pain, suffering and shock as well as loss of earnings due to pregnancy and the expenses of child birth if this occurred as a result of the rape. (para 14)
JUDGMENT
Mohan, J. - This public interest litigation invokes the benign provisions of Article 32 of the Constitution of India, at the instance of the petitioner Delhi Domestic Working Womens Forum to espouse the pathetic plight of four domestic servants who were subject to indecent sexual assault by seven Army personnel.
2. The incident, with a filmy background, has outclassed even the movies. On 10th of February, 1993, six women, by name, Usha Minz, Shanti, Josphine Kerketta, Rosy Kerketta, Nilli and Lili, domestic servants, were travelling by Muri Express. The journey was from Ranchi to Delhi. One of the victims Miss Lili described the incidence graphically as follows:
"I was coming from my home town to Delhi by Muri Express: On 10.2.1993 at about 11.00 PM, the Muri Express was at the Khmja Railway Station. At that time, I along with my village girls (1) Usha Minz d/o John Minz (2) Shanti d/o Siri Anuas Minz (3) Josphine Kerketta d/o Junus Kerketta (4) Rosy Kerketta d/o Remis Kerketta (5) Nilli Ross d/o Boas Minz, was travelling in SRI Coach. I slept at berth No. 50. Ourfriend, Shanti, woke up and told that some persons were teasing her. When, I and my remaining friends got up, we saw that about 7/8 army ‘Jawan’ had come near us. Then we all friends got up and sat on our respective seats. Then all those army -men began to molest us. First they - two sikhs and 6 cleaned shaved men made me and my five friends sit on lower seats and then kissed and hughed us and lured on our body and breasts. On our objection they caught us from our hair and began to beat us. When we tried to cry, they shut our mouths. Then they threatened me and my friends that in case we will make any hue and cry they will throw us out of the running train and will kill us. On this we got frightened and sat there. From these 8 army men - two sikhs and 6 clean shaved, one sardar and one clean shaved man forcibly made me to lie down ort the lower berth and on the other adjacent lower berth another sardar took another girl and one clean shaved fauji took Rossy to bathroom. Two other army men made Shanti to lie down on the nearby seat. Another two men tried to take Usha and Nilli but both sat under the seat to hid themselves. Thereafter, first Sardar Fauji (whose name has been disclosed in the court as Dhir Singh S/o Puran Singh, PO: Dostpur, PS: Kalanaur, Distt: Gurdaspur (Punjab), forcibly put off my cloth and removed underwear, raped me. After him, another clean shaved fauji, whose face is round and height is about 58" raped me. My friends Shanti and Rosy were also forcibly raped by remaining army men. Thereafter, we tried to lodge a report with the police on the way, but nobody listened us. When the train stopped at New Delhi Railway Station, then I and my friends attempted to catch these persons. They all got down and ran here and there. However, I and my friends could catch hold of aforesaid Sardar Dhir Singh, who had raped me. We all caught him. In the meanwhile, some persons gathered there. Some Army Officers and Policemen overpowered him and took him to MCO office. Then after a while they came in Station and handed over Shri Dhir Singh to you. Sardar Dhir Singh has raped me and his colleagues have raped my friends."
3. This formed the basis of the first information report for offences under Section 376B read with Section 341 I.P.C. which was registerd at the Police Station New Delhi Railway Station (Crime & Railways) as No. 049 of 1993 at 6.35 A.M. on 11th February, 1993. It appears after registering the F.I.R. the six rape victims were sent for medical check up.
4. The members of the petitioner-Forum went in groups to all the addresses given by the police to meet the victims. In none of the places they were allowed to meet the victims though the employers admitted gaining knowledge about the rape and the victims were with them. The petitioner-forum is very much concerned as the victims are its members, to get the needed social, cultural and legal protection.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.