1. The plaintiff has instituted this suit (i) for declaration that the publication of Article in the newspaper “Dainik Samayik Prasanga” dated 21st November, 2016 by the defendants is bad in law and contrary to the Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana; (ii) for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from publishing and reporting any Article/news similar to the Article dated 21st November, 2016; and, (iii) for recovery of damages in the sum of Rs. 1,00,00,000/-.

2. The suit came up for admission on 21st December, 2016 and thereafter on 23rd December, 2016 when after hearing the counsels for the plaintiff at length I was of the view that the suit is not maintainable. Though I was proceeding to dictate the order in the Court but the counsel for the plaintiff stated that he wanted to file some judgments. Permitting written arguments to be filed on or before 5th January, 2017, orders on maintainability of the suit were reserved.

3. The plaintiff has since filed written arguments with copies of three judgments and which have been perused by me.

4. It is the case of the plaintiff in the plaint (i) that the plaintiff is an approved “Training Partner” for the “Pradhan Mantri