RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MAYUR EXPORTS – Respondent
IA No.7177/2013 (of plaintiff u/O XXXIV R-3(2)&(3) CPC)
1. In this mortgage suit under Order XXXIV of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.7,03,500/- with future interest @ 17% per annum compounded quarterly from the date of institution of the suit till realisation and for sale of the hypothecated and mortgaged properties for realisation of the said amounts, on 26th April, 2001, a preliminary decree in the sum of Rs.7,03,500/- along with interest @ 12.5% per annum with costs was passed and the defendants were directed to pay into the Court the decretal amount within six months therefrom. It was further provided that if no payment is made, the plaintiff Bank would be entitled to seek a final decree.
2. The defendants M/s Mayur Exports and Shri Anil Kumar Sethi though had contested the suit by filing a written statement but the judgment dated 26th April, 2001 records that the defendants stopped appearing at the stage of evidence and neither cross-examined the witnesses of the plaintiff Bank nor led evidence of their own. Hence, the preliminary decree a
Baljit Singh Vs. J.I. Cunnington
K. Parmeswaran Pillai Vs. K. Sumathi
Muchi Dola Behara Vs. Jujisti Jami
Monotosh Kumar Mitra Vs. Amrendranath Shah
Nandlal Bhagirath Kanoria Vs. National Industrial Development Corporation
Smt. Amiya Debi Vs. Ranendra Narayan Saha
Suresh Chandra Banerjee Vs. United Bank of India Ltd.
Sri. Veera Hanuman Rice & Flour Mill Vs. State Bank of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.