SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 133

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW
JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MAYUR EXPORTS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiff : Mr. Dilip Pandita, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

IA No.7177/2013 (of plaintiff u/O XXXIV R-3(2)&(3) CPC)

1. In this mortgage suit under Order XXXIV of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for recovery of Rs.7,03,500/- with future interest @ 17% per annum compounded quarterly from the date of institution of the suit till realisation and for sale of the hypothecated and mortgaged properties for realisation of the said amounts, on 26th April, 2001, a preliminary decree in the sum of Rs.7,03,500/- along with interest @ 12.5% per annum with costs was passed and the defendants were directed to pay into the Court the decretal amount within six months therefrom. It was further provided that if no payment is made, the plaintiff Bank would be entitled to seek a final decree.

2. The defendants M/s Mayur Exports and Shri Anil Kumar Sethi though had contested the suit by filing a written statement but the judgment dated 26th April, 2001 records that the defendants stopped appearing at the stage of evidence and neither cross-examined the witnesses of the plaintiff Bank nor led evidence of their own. Hence, the preliminary decree a


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top