SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Del) 182

DEEPA SHARMA
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
ALLAHABAD BANK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Plaintiffs : Mr. Sandeep Sethi with Mr. Kanishk Ahuja.
For the Defendants : Mr. Sugam Seth with Ms. Renukha Iyer.

JUDGMENT :

DEEPA SHARMA, J.

I.A. No. 22985/2015 (application on behalf of defendant under Order 37 read with Section 151 CPC for leave to defend)

1. Vide this application the defendant (hereinafter called as “AB”) has sought the leave to defend the case.

2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXVII of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) for the recovery of USD 1,505,267.81 equivalent to Rs. 11,00,04,972.03p. along with pendente lite and future interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of institution of the present suit till its actual realization.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff Malayan Banking Berhad (hereinafter called as “MBB”) is a foreign bank of Malaysia. AB is a nationalized bank functioning in India and has one of its branches at Delhi and is working under the supervision of the Reserve Bank of India (hereinafter called as RBI) and therefore is bound to adhere to all the norms and international standards for banking practices in its operations. It is submitted that M/s Millennium Wires Pvt. Ltd (buyer) through State T




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top