VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Anil Lamba – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT – Respondent
Valmiki J. Mehta, J.
1. By these writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners who are contractual employees of the respondent no.3/Institute of Liver and Biliary Science seek relief of regularization of their services. Petitioners also seek an additional relief that petitioners should not be terminated from their services by replacing them with similarly situated contractual employees.
2. So far as the first issue is concerned, learned senior counsel for the respondent no.3 places reliance upon para 3 of the advertisements issued with respect to the petitioners and as per which advertisements, appointment of the petitioners was to be on contractual basis and accordingly it is argued that contractual employees cannot seek regularization. One such advertisement para 3 reads as under:-
“3. All appointments shall be on “contract basis” and will be initially for a period of ‘four years’ including a probationary period of one year. The contractual appointment may be extended for a further period of ‘four years’ based on performance of the candidate during the initial period of four years.”
3. Learned senior counsel for the respondent no.3 according
Ambica Quarry Works v. State of Gujarat
Binod Kumar Gupta v. Ram Ashray Mahoto
Bhagwati Prasad v. Delhi State Mineral Development Corpn.
Bhavnagar University v. Palitana Sugar Mill (P) Ltd.
Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. v. N.R. Vairamani
B.N. Nagarajan v. State of Karnataka
Delhi Development Horticulture Employees’ Union v. Delhi Admn.
Delhi Development Horticulture Employees’ Union v. Delhi Admn.
Dhirendra Chamoli v. State of U.P.
Daily Rated Casual Labour v. Union of India
Dharwad Distt. P.W.D. Literate Daily Wage Employees’ Assn. v. State of Karnataka
Excise Supdt. v. K.B.N. Visweshwara Rao
Gangadhar Pillai v. Siemens Ltd.
Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. Dan Bahadur Singh
Indian Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Workmen
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. L.V. Subramanyeswara
Keshav Dutt & Ors. Vs. Delhi Tourism & Transport Corporation Limited and Ors. (2015) 150 DRJ 406
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Official Liquidator Vs. Dayanand & Others
National Fertilizers Ltd. and Others Vs. Somvir Singh
R.N. Nanjundappa v. T. Thimmiah
State of Haryana v. Piara Singh
State of Haryana and Others Vs. Piara Singh and Others
State of Mysore v. S.V. Narayanappa
State of Bihar v. Upendra Narayan Singh
State of M.P. v. Mohd. Abrahim
State of Orissa v. Sudhansu Sekhar Misra
State of Orissa and Another Vs. Mamata Mohanty
U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Pooran Chandra Pandey and Others (2007) 11 SCC 92
Union Public Service Commission v. Girish Jayanti Lal Vaghela
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.