PRATIBHA RANI
State – Appellant
Versus
Ajay Kumar Sharma – Respondent
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
1. Feeling aggrieved by the acquittal order dated 5th August, 2000 of the respondent Ajay Kumar Sharma of the offence punishable under Section 284/304(II)/308/120-B IPC by the learned Trial Court, the State preferred Criminal Leave Petition No.113/2002. The leave to appeal was granted by this Court vide its order dated 17th January, 2005 which reads as under:-
‘Crl.L.P.No.113/2002
Since the matter has been listed for final disposal vide the order of this Court, it would be appropriate to grant leave in the first instance and thereafter list the matter for disposal.
Bailable warrants in the sum of Rs.5000/- be issued against the respondent Ajay Kumar Sharma.
List the matter on 19.4.2005.’
2. The four convicts namely Rajiv Sapra, Satpal Sethi, Naresh Bhardwaj and Amrish Bhatnagar, who were convicted by the learned Trial Court vide judgment dated 5th August, 2000 had filed Crl.A.Nos.577/2000, 589/2000 and 601/2000, which were admitted.
3. All the four appeals i.e. the instant appeal preferred by the State and the three appeals preferred by the convicts namely Rajiv Sapra, Satpal Sethi, Naresh Bhardwaj and Amrish Bhatnagar, which are arising out of the same judgmen
Aher Raja Khima v. State of Saurashtra
Balbir Singh v. State of Punjab
Bhagwan Singh v. State of M.P.
Bishan Singh v. State of Punjab
C. Antony v. K.G. Raghavan Nair
Chandrappa v. State of Karnataka
Harijana Thirupala v. Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P.
K. Gopal Reddy v. State of A.P.
Khedu Mohton v. State of Bihar
M.G. Agarwal v. State of Maharashtra
Madan Mohan Singh v. State of U.P.
Noor Khan v. State of Rajasthan
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.