SANJIV KHANNA, NAVIN CHAWLA
Mahinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Navin Chawla, J.
The petitioner, in the above petition, challenges before us the order dated 29.01.1998 passed by the Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force (hereinafter referred as “RPF” in short), New Delhi removing him from the service with immediate effect. The petitioner further challenges the order dated 20.07.1998 passed by the Deputy CSC, RPF, Northern Railway, New Delhi dismissing his appeal against the above order.
2. Before we deal with the merits of the case, it is essential for us to give a brief background as to how this case has come before us.
3. The petitioner had challenged the above orders by way of a Civil Suit, being Suit No.900/2006/1999 filed before the Senior Civil Judge, Delhi praying for declaration that the above impugned orders be declared null and void ab initio and illegal and also for a direction to reinstate him in service.
4. The said suit was decreed in favour of the petitioner vide judgment and decree dated 23.12.2008 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge.
5. Union of India and the Director General, RPF challenged the above judgment before the Court of District Judge, Delhi by way of RCA No.25/2009. Learned Additional D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.