SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Del) 2115

ANU MALHOTRA
KRISHNA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
VIPIN KUMAR – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Raj Kumar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

ANU MALHOTRA, J.

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner assails the impugned order dated 09.03.2018 of the Court of the learned CCJ-cum-ARC-1 (Central), (Pilot Court), Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi in Eviction Petition No.673/2017/CIS 785/2017 whereby the eviction petition filed by the respondent nos. 1 & 2 to the present R.C. Rev. 472/2018 seeking eviction of the petitioner herein from the tenanted premises i.e. one hall admeasuring 14’8” x 9’0”and one room admeasuring 7’5” x 10’0”and passage admeasuring 3’6”(width) on the ground floor, House No.10433, Gali Pathshalawali, Manakpura, Karol Bagh, New Delhi-110005, more specifically shown in red colour in the site plan annexed along with the petition on the ground of bona fide requirement under Section 14 (1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 as amended, was allowed, with it having been directed that the said order would not be executed for a period of six months from the date of the impugned order i.e. 09.03.2018 in terms of Section 14 (7) of the enactment.

2. Vide order dated 28.09.2018, the matter was directed to be renotified for the date 01.10.2018 inasmuch as no affidavit had been filed on the record by the pe















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top