NAVIN CHAWLA
Chandok Machineries – Appellant
Versus
S. N. Sunderson & Co. – Respondent
1. This petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’) has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Arbitral Award dated 12th June, 2017 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consisting of three Arbitrators in Arbitration Case No.20017/ANL adjudicating the disputes that have arisen between the parties in relation to the two Memorandum of Understandings dated 1st September, 2014.
2. By way of the Impugned Award, the Arbitral Tribunal has inter alia directed the petitioner to pay to the respondent a sum of Rs.2,27,36,444.88, subject to the petitioner raising an appropriate invoice for the amount of Rs.1,32,99,020.11. The Arbitral Tribunal has further directed the petitioner to pay interest @ 9% per annum from the last date of dispatch.
3. The learned senior counsel for the petitioner contends that in terms of Section 29A of the Act, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal had terminated on 13th June, 2017. He submits that the Impugned Award, though has a typed date of 12th June, 2017, was passed only on 28th June, 2017, which is the date mentioned under the signatures of one of the Arbitrators and, therefore, the Imp
Associate Builders vs. Delhi Development Authority
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. vs. C.Rajasekhar Rao
Johara Bibi v. Mohammad Sadak Thambi Marakayar
P.R. Shah, Shares & Stock Brokers (P) Ltd. v. B.H.H. Securities (P) Ltd.
R.Dasaratha Rao v. K.RamaswamyIyengar
State of West Bengal vs. Sree Sree MA Engineering & Anr.
Thakur Pratap Singh v. Shri Krishna Gupta & Ors. (1955) 2 SCR 1029
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.