J.R.MIDHA
Kismat Singh – Appellant
Versus
Piariya Devi – Respondent
1. The greatest challenge before the judiciary today is frivolous litigation. False claims are a huge strain on the judicial system. In Subrata Roy Sahara v. Union of India, (2014) 8 SCC 470, the Supreme Court observed that the Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted with frivolous litigation and a mechanism needs to be evolved to deter litigants from their compulsive obsession towards senseless and ill-considered claims. Relevant portion of the said judgment is reproduced hereunder :
“191. The Indian judicial system is grossly afflicted, with frivolous litigation. Ways and means need to be evolved, to deter litigants from their compulsive obsession, towards senseless and ill-considered claims.” (Emphasis supplied)
2. The appellant has challenged the order dated 8th April, 2011 whereby the Commissioner, Employees Compensation awarded a compensation of Rs.3,27,705/- and funeral charges of Rs.2,500/- along with interest @ 12% per annum w.e.f. 30th October, 2004 to the respondents.
3. Respondent No.1 is the mother and respondent No.2 is the son of late Ajay @ Mahavir Mehto (hereinafter referred to as ‘Ajay’) and they filed an application for compensation before the Commissi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.