SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Del) 568

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
S. Ravindra Bhat, S. Muralidhar, Vibhu Bakhru, JJ.
Gillette India Ltd. - Appellant
Vs.
Commissioner of Customs And Others - Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1735 of 2016, Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 7433 of 2016
Decided On : 23-04-2019

Advocates Appeared:
Jayant K. Mehta, Adv., Shaurya Kuthiala, Adv., Kapil Arora, Adv., Nayan Jain, Adv., Suveni Bhagat, Adv., Rahul Kukreja, Adv., Shubhankar, Adv., Sajal Jain, Adv., Sameer Jain, Adv., Angad Sandhu, Adv., Suvigya Awasthy, Adv., Anu Suia, Adv., Karan Valecha, Adv., Anant Gupta, Adv.

Headnote:

Customs Act, 1962 - Section 125, 126 - Import - Payment - Redemption - Confiscation - Importer have not made the payment of the redemption fine duty interest - Order of confiscation of imported goods passed - Order has attained finality - Power of Central Government to retain the excess auction proceeds after adjusting the customs duty, interest, penalty and redemption fine - Failure to pay the redemption fine in lieu of confiscation as determined under Section 125 of the Act - Confiscated goods vesting absolutely in the central government Section 126 of the Act - Central Government can only recover through the sale of such goods the duty, penalty and interest - Excess should be returned to the owner of the goods - Central government in such circumstance is under no obligation to return the excess amount to the importer - MMTC v. Surjit Singh Kanda to that extent it contrary - The same is overruled.

JUDGMENT :

S. Muralidhar, J.

The question that has been referred to this larger Bench for decision by an order dated 9th March, 2016 of the Division Bench (DB) of this Court in the present petition is as follows:

Notwithstanding that an importer may not have made the payment of the redemption fine duty interest and penalty within the time stipulated in the order of confiscation of imported goods passed under Section 125 read with Section 126 of the Customs Act, 1962 ("Act), and which order has attained finality, but makes such payment belatedly but prior to the date of auction, can the Central Government retain the excess auction proceeds after adjusting the customs duty, interest, penalty and redemption fine or has such excess amount have to be returned paid to the owner of the goods?

2. The answer to the above question would require interpretation of the expression 'vest with the Central Government' occurring in Section 126 (1) of the Act. In this context, this Bench has also been tasked with examining the correctness of the decision of a DB of this Court in MMTC v Surjit Singh Kanda, (2013) 196 DLT 725 (DB).

The background facts

3. The background facts have been set out in detail in the referral order dated 9th March, 2016 which reads as under:

"1. The Petitioner, Gillette India Ltd. ("GIL"), is before this Court aggrieved by the auction process initiated by the Department of Customs ("Department") in respect of the goods imported by GIL under three Bills of Entry ("B/Es").

2. GIL imported 1008 Power Tooth Brushes under B/E No. 5980646 (hereafter "B/E No. 1") dated 13th February, 2012 in a single consignment and warehoused the said consignment in a public bonded warehouse by executing a Warehousing Bond under Section 59 of the Customs Act, 1962 ("Act").

3. GIL imported 300 Power Tooth Brushes under B/E No. 6029833 dated 17th February, 2012 (hereafter "B/E No. 2") and executed a warehousing bond in respect thereof under Section 59 of the Act.

4. The third consignment comprising (a) 76,800 units of Gillette Mach 3 Cartridges (b) 1,02,400 units of Gillette Mach 3 (c) 2,68,800 units of Gillette Mach 3 Cartridges (d) 30,720 units of Gillette Fusion Cartridges was imported by Bill of Entry No.6568999 (hereafter "B/E No. 3") dated 17th April, 2012. This was warehoused in the public bonded warehouse for which a Warehousing Bond was executed by GIL under Section 59 of the Act. It is stated that a substantial portion of the said consignment was removed during the warehousing period. However, one portion thereof containing 7680 pieces remained in the warehouse.

5. A request was made by the Petitioner for extending the warehousing period under Section 61(1) of the Act in respect of the aforementioned B/Es. A personal hearing was granted to the Petitioner on 20th December 2013 by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs ("DC") (Bond) in respect of B/E Nos.1 and 2.

6. An Order-in-Original dated 31st December, 2013 was passed in respect of B/E No.1 confiscating the goods under Section 111 read with Section 111(d), (j) and (o) thereof. However, an option was given to GIL to redeem the goods confiscated by paying redemption fine of Rs.25,000/- in terms of Section 125(1) of the Act within 30 days of the said order. The order made it clear that "in case the redemption fine is not paid within time, ownership of the goods will vest with the Central Government in terms of Section 126 of the Customs Act, 1962." It was further stated that after redemption of the goods, GIL would be allowed a one-time clearance of the goods, within 30 days of the receipt of the order, on payment of duty and interest at the applicable rates under Section 61(2) of the Act read with Section 72(b) of the Act thereof. Additionally, a penalty of Rs. 10,000/- was imposed under Section 112 of the Act.

7. As far as B/E No. 2 is concerned, a separate order of the same date was passed confiscating the goods and giving an option to GIL to redeem the goods on paying a redemption fine of Rs.10,000































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top