IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, PRATEEK JALAN, JJ.
Syniverse Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Another – Respondents
Writ Petition (Civil) Nos. 1507, 1508 of 2018, Civil Miscellaneous Application Nos. 6169, 6171, 25847, 30120 of 2018
Decided On : 08-03-2019
Telegraph Act, 1885 - Section 36(1) R/w 11(1)(b) - Mobile Number Portability - Service providers licensed - Validity of the Telecommunication Mobile Number Portability Per Port Transaction Charge and Dipping Charge [Amendment] Regulations - Lack of transparency - Consultation paper issued by TRAI did not indicate that porting charges would be payable only for successful transactions - Explanatory Memorandum to the impugned Amendment Regulations does not reveal adequate consideration of the comments submitted by the MNP service providers - Entitlement of the MNP service providers to situations of successful porting is not only contrary to the statutory scheme, but also penalizes them for failures which may not be attributable to them at all - Impugned Amendment is ex facie arbitrary.
PRATEEK JALAN, J.
1. The petitioners in these two cases are Mobile Number Portability [hereinafter referred to as "MNP"] service providers licensed under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885. They have challenged the validity of the Telecommunication Mobile Number Portability Per Port Transaction Charge and Dipping Charge [Amendment] Regulations, 2018 [hereinafter referred to as "the impugned Amendment"] issued by the respondent Telecom Regulatory Authority of India [hereinafter referred to as "TRAI"]. The impugned Amendment seeks to amend Regulation 3 of the Telecommunication Mobile Number Portability Per Port Transaction Charge and Dipping Charge Regulations, 2009 [hereinafter referred to as "the PPTC Regulations]."
Background and Regulatory Provisions
2. "Porting" is the process by which mobile telephone subscribers may transfer their mobile connection from one telecom service provider [hereinafter referred to as "TSP"] to another. TRAI introduced MNP in India by issuing the MNP Regulations, which were notified on 23.09.2009. These Regulations were made under Section 36(1) read with sub-clauses (i), (iii) and (v) of Section 11(1)(b) of the Act. The MNP Regulations provided inter alia for the licensing of MNP service providers, such as the petitioners herein, who would be tasked with various functions enumerated thereunder. The PPTC Regulations were simultaneously issued inter-alia to quantify the compensation payable to MNP service providers.
3. The following provisions of the MNP Regulations (as amended by Amendment Regulations of 2012, 2013 and 2015) are relevant for the purposes of these petitions:-
"2. Definitions - In these regulations, unless the context otherwise requires:-
xxx xxx xxx
(e) "Donor Operator" means a Cellular Mobile Telecom Service provider or Unified Access Service provider, to whose network the mobile number belongs at the time the subscriber makes a request for porting.
xxx xxx xxx
(i) "Mobile Number Portability" means the facility which allows a subscriber to retain his mobile telephone number when he moves from one Access Provider to another irrespective of the mobile technology or from one cellular mobile technology to another of the same Access Provider.
(j) "Mobile Number Portability Service provider" means an entity who has been granted a license under Section 4 of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 (13 of 1885) for providing Mobile Number Portability Service.
xxx xxx xxx
(n) "Per Port Transaction charge" means the charge payable by the Recipient Operator to the Mobile Number Portability Service provider for processing the porting request in respect of a mobile number.
(o) "Porting" means the process of moving, by a subscriber, of his mobile number or numbers, as the case may be, from one Access Provider to another Access Provider or from one mobile technology to another of the same or any other Access Provider.
(p) "Porting charge" means such charge as may be levied by a Recipient Operator from a subscriber for porting his mobile number.
(q) "Recipient Operator" means an Access Provider who will be providing mobile telecommunication service to the subscriber after porting and includes his authorised agent.
xxx xxx xxx
4. Obligation to provide Mobile Number Portability - Every Access Provider shall facilitate in its entire network, Mobile Number Portability to all subscribers, both pre-paid and post-paid and shall, upon request, provide the same on a non-discriminatory basis.
xxx xxx xxx
6. Eligibility Criteria for making a porting request - Every subscriber shall be eligible to make a request for porting his mobile number:
Provided that:-
(a) a period of ninety days has expired from the date of activation of his mobile connection in the case of a mobile number not ported earlier; or from the date of activation of his mobile number after its last porting, in the case of a mobile number which has been ported e
Cellular Operators Association of India vs. TRAI
Essar Steel Ltd. vs. Union of India
India Cement Ltd. vs. Union of India
Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India
Khoday Distilleries Ltd. vs. State of Karnataka
Parisons Agrotech Private Ltd. vs. Union of India
Prag Ice Mills vs. Union of India
R. vs. North and East Devon Health Authority, Ex p Coughlan
Saraswati Industrial Syndicate Ltd. vs. Union of India
Shri Malaprabha Coop. Sugar Factory Ltd. vs. Union of India
Shri Sitaram Sugar Co. Ltd. vs. Union of India
State of T.N. vs. P. Krishnamurthy
State of U.P. vs. Renusagar Power Co. (1988) 4 SCC 59
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.