V.K.JAIN
K. O. Issac – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
V.K. JAIN, J.
1. In these petitions u/s 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners are seeking quashing of the charge/notice framed against them u/s 251 of the Code, on a complaint filed by the respondent No. 2 u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. It has been stated in the petition that M/s Samudra Bio Pharma (P) Ltd. Formerly known as Shantha Marine Biotechnologies Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred as 'the Company') was granted loan assistance of Rs. 350.00 lacs by respondent No. 2. On account of financial difficulties, the company could not make repayment of the loan taken by it and entered into a Deed of Settlement, pursuant to which 48 Post Dated Cheques were issued to Respondent No. 2. The cheques, when presented, were dishonoured for want of funds. Complaints u/s 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act were filed by Respondent No. 2 at New Delhi against four persons including the Company and the petitioners.
2. The case of the petitioners is that the court of Metropolitan Magistrate at Delhi lacked jurisdiction to entertain the complaint as no cause of action arose in Delhi. It has also been stated that the complaint does not contain any averment to show as to how th
Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi 163 (2009) DLT 56
Harman Electronics (P) Ltd. and Another Vs. National Panasonic India Ltd.
K. Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Another
Smt. Shamshad Begum Vs. B. Mohammed
Prem Chand Vijay Kumar Vs. Yashpal Singh and Another
Mosaraf Hossain Khan v. Bhagheeratha Engg. Ltd. (2006) 3 SCC 658
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.