HIMA KOHLI, ASHA MENON
Neeru Dhir – Appellant
Versus
Kamal Kishore Dhir – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
HIMA KOHLI, J.
1. The appellants/plaintiffs have questioned the judgment dated 23.05.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing a suit for partition and permanent injunction instituted by them against the respondents/defendants claiming that they are collectively entitled to 1/10th undivided share in the residential premises bearing No.C-324, Vivek Vihar, Delhi.
2. The three appellants/plaintiffs are the successors-in-interest (widow and children) of late Shri Anil Kumar Dhir, brother of the respondents No.1 to 7 and the deceased respondents No.8 and 9. The factual averments made in the plaint have been neatly summarised in para 1 of the impugned judgment. For the sake of convenience, the said para is extracted below:-
CBSE v. Aditya Bandopadhyay [(2011) 8 SCC 497
I.T.C. Ltd. vs. Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
Jaydayal Poddar (Deceased) through LRs and Anr. vs. Mst. Bibi Hazra and Ors.
Marcel Martins vs. M. Printer and Others
Pawan Kumar vs. Babulal Since Deceased through Legal Representatives and Ors.
Popat and Kotecha Property v. SBI Staff Assn. [Popat and Kotecha Property v. SBI Staff Assn.
Popat and Kotecha Property vs. State Bank of India Staff Association
R. Rajagopal Reddy (dead) by LRs and Ors. vs. Padmini Chandrasekharan (dead) by LRs
Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd. vs. Ganesh Property
Roop Lal Sathi vs. Nachhattar Singh Gill
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.