JYOTI SINGH
Sirisha Dinavahi Bansal – Appellant
Versus
Rajiv Bansal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Jyoti Singh, J. - Present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.PC seeking directions to set aside the Order dated 01.06.2020 passed in Complaint Case No. 2248/2020 under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") by the Learned Metropolitan Magistrate.
2. At the threshold, an objection has been raised by Learned Counsel for the Respondent against the maintainability of the present Petition before this Court and, therefore, the narrative of the facts is only to the extent of deciding the maintainability.
3. The sequential narration, shorn of unnecessary details is that the marriage between the Petitioner and Respondent was solemnized on 09.03.2003 and after marriage the parties continued to stay in the United States of America. Over a period of time, Parties were blessed with three daughters aged 11 years, 7 years and 3 years, respectively, at present. After the birth of third child in 2017, parties shifted to India and the Respondent started working with a renowned Media house on a Senior Post. As the averments in the Petition go, in 2018, Respondent quit his job and started his own business in partnership with an
Arun Shankar Shukla vs. State of U.P.
Avadh Narain Lal vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Dhariwal Tobaco Products Ltd. and Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab and Another
Pepsi Foods Ltd. and Ors. vs. Special Judicial Magistrate and Ors.
Prabhu Chawla vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.