Back
JAYANT NATH
Mahua Bindal – Appellant
Versus
Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the policy of state quota allocation (Para 1) |
| 2. background of the petitioners and admission processes (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. contentions regarding institutional preference and constitutional principles (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. arguments by the government and other respondents (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. rejoinder arguments from petitioners (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. analysis on significant supreme court judgments (Para 19) |
| 7. saurabh chaudri and yatinkumar patel judgments analyzed (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. historical context of similar pleas in prior rulings (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 9. summary of rejected contentions in previous cases (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 10. arguments on binding precedent and judicial propriety (Para 30 , 31) |
| 11. rejection of petitioners' arguments on binding nature of judgments (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 12. court's authority on institutional preference as per supreme court (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 13. final determination of petition's merit (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 14. dismissal of the petition (Para 47) |
JUDGMENT
Jayant Nath, J. - This writ petition is filed by the petitioners seeking the following reliefs:-
"(i) DECLARING policy
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
