IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATEEK JALAN, J.
Bhim Singh – Petitioner
Versus
AGM State Bank of India and Another – Respondents
W.P. (C) No. 354 of 2021, C.M. APPL. No. 915 of 2021
Decided On : 08-04-2021
National Trust for Welfare of Persons with Autism, Cerebral Palsy, Mental Retardation and Multiple Disabilities Act, 1999 - Sections 14 and 14(4) - Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 - Old/sick/incapacitated bank customers - Bank account transactions - petitioner claims to have visited the Bank and made a request for the withdrawal of the said amount from the bank account of AKS to meet his medical expenses - However, the request was denied by the Bank on the ground that there was no policy which allowed for such withdrawals, even by family members in cases of medical emergencies, and that it can only be done under the orders of a competent court.
Finding of the Court:
Report of the Medical Board and the clarification given by Dr. Srivastava that AKS is in a comatose state, and incapable of operating his bank account himself or giving necessary directions for this purpose. The report of the Tehsildar corroborates the information placed on record by the petitioner-petitioner may be appointed as the guardian of AKS for the purpose of withdrawal of a fixed monthly amount from the savings account of AKS, subject to the safeguards contained in the guidelines incorporated in Vandana Tyagi.
Result: Application disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
PRATEEK JALAN, J.
The proceedings in the matter have been conducted through hybrid mode [physical and virtual mode].
1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction upon the respondent/State Bank of India [“the Bank”] to release an amount of Rs. 30,000 per month to him from the bank account of his incapacitated nephew, Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh [“AKS”].
2. The case of the petitioner is that AKS has been rendered incapacitated and bedridden as he has been suffering from acute ischemic strokes since 2018. According to the petitioner, AKS’s health worsened in November, 2020, for which he had to be hospitalized. A discharge report of the Department of Neurology of the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi [“AIIMS”] dated 07.11.2020 has been placed on record [Annexure P-3 to the writ petition] in this regard. He further submits that an amount of Rs. 30,000 per month would be required so as to meet AKS’s daily and medical expenditure, including doctors’ fees, medicines, food, therapist, nurse etc. Although AKS is married and has two children (who were impleaded in this petition as respondent nos. 3 to 5 vide order dated 11.01.2021), it is stated that he and his wife had mutually decided to part ways on account of marital discord. A settlement dated 06.02.2020 was entered into by them (Annexure P-5 to the writ petition), which has, however, not been enforced due to the ailing health of AKS. The petitioner, being the paternal uncle of AKS, states that he has been taking care of his nephew and has been acting as his guardian, in addition to maintaining his own family, but is not in a position to financially sustain his nephew indefinitely, and meet his medical expenditure as well.
3. The petitioner claims to have visited the Bank and made a request for the withdrawal of the said amount from the bank account of AKS to meet his medical expenses. However, the request was denied by the Bank on the ground that there was no policy which allowed for such withdrawals, even by family members in cases of medical emergencies, and that it can only be done under the orders of a competent court. The petitioner thereafter addressed a letter dated 09.12.2020, reiterating the above request. However, the letter has not elicited a response.
4. The present writ petition has been filed in the above circumstances, in which the petitioner has sought the following relief:
(b) Pass any other orders that this Hon'ble Court deems just fit and necessary.”
5. Notice was issued in this petition on 11.01.2021, including to the wife and children of AKS, who were arrayed as respondent nos. 3 to 5 in the petition. By the said order, this Court also requested Mr. Ramesh Singh, then learned Standing Counsel (Civil) for the Government of NCT of Delhi [“GNCTD”] to assist it as Amicus Curiae, and also take instructions as to whether the GNCTD can carry out any exercise of verification of the status of the petitioner and the averments made in the petition.
6. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, Mr. Singh appeared on 25.01.2021 and drew my attention to Clause 5.7 of the Master Circular on Maintenance of Deposit Accounts - UCB dated 01.07.2009 [“the Master Circular”] issued by the Reserve Bank of India [“RBI”] the relevant portions of which read as follows:
5.7.1 In order to facilitate old/sick/incapacitated bank customers to operate their bank accounts, procedure as laid down in paragraph 5.6.2 below may be followed. The cases of sick/old/incapacitated account holders fall into the following categories:
(i) an account holder who is too ill to sign a cheque/cannot be physically p
Old/sick/incapacitated bank customers - Person who would be entitled to operate his bank account and can be appointed as guardian to the person.
The appointment of a limited guardian and a nominated representative for a patient suffering from advanced Alzheimer's disease under the relevant provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities....
Point of law: It shall be the duty of the petitioner – guardian to meet the obligations/duties similar to those as described under Section 15 and to maintain and submit the accounts similar to those ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to appoint guardians and managers for a person suffering from dementia, the recognition of the Petitioners' authority by bank....
The court established that it can act as parens patriae to appoint a guardian for a comatose patient when no legislative provisions exist.
The court reaffirmed the principle that guardianship for mentally ill persons should prioritize family relationships, allowing spouses and immediate relatives to jointly manage health and financial a....
Person who is mentally retarded and who has lost his parents cannot be permitted to remain without a guardian for a long period of time and considering the object of the Act, it is imperative on the ....
The welfare of the minor is the paramount consideration in appointing a guardian, and the provisions of the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 and the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 should be i....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.