VIBHU BAKHRU
Gupta And Co. – Appellant
Versus
DDA – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter the ‘A&C Act’) impugning an arbitral award dated 02.12.2020 to the extent that the Arbitral Tribunal has not awarded pre-reference interest in respect of petitioner‘s Claim Nos. 1 to 4.
2. The respondent (hereinafter ‘the DDA’) had issued a notice inviting tenders for the work of “Construction of 1600 SFS houses category II & III at Trilok Puri, Pocket ‘B’ SH: Construction of 160 SFS houses category II & III 80 Nos. Two bedroom category II, 80 nos. three bedroom category III & 120 scooter garages under SFS pocket ‘E’ including internal development Group V”.
3. Subsequently, by a letter dated 10.03.1986, the DDA awarded the said work to the petitioner. The works were to be completed within a period of twelve months from the 10th day of issuance of the letter of award, that is, by 20.03.1987. The petitioner states that it completed the contracted works on 29.08.1989 and there appears to be no dispute that the works were taken over by the DDA. However, the petitioner states that the completion of the works was not recorded and the
Dyna Technologies Private Limited v. Crompton Greaves Limited: (2019) 2 SCC 1
Som Datt Builders Limited v. State of Kerala: (2009) 10 SCC 259
Union of India v. Mohan Lal Capoor (1973) 2 SCC 836 : 1974 SCC (L&S) 5
Woolcombers of India Ltd. v. Workers' Union (1974) 3 SCC 318 : 1973 SCC (L&S) 551 : AIR 1973 SC 2758
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.