SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Del) 254

ANU MALHOTRA
Kamran – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Meenakshi Dahiya, APP.

JUDGMENT :

1. The appellant, vide the present appeal assails the impugned judgment dated 27.02.2020 and the impugned order on sentence dated 02.03.2020 of the learned District & Sessions Judge (North-East), KKD Courts, Delhi whereby the appellant having been convicted qua the offences punishable under Sections 392/397/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of the payment of the said fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 2 (two) months qua the offence punishable under Section 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and was also sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 7 (seven) years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default of payment of the said fine, to further undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of 2 (two) months qua the offence punishable under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 with both the sentences having been directed to run concurrently with the benefit of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 having been given to the appellant as well as to the co-convict Mohd. Shahzad who was convicted and sentenced to underg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top