Rahis vs State - 2022 Supreme(Del) 1949

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Del) 1949

ANU MALHOTRA
Rahis – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
U A Khan, S A Khan & Shahrukh Khan, Advocates. Appellant through VC from JC in CRL.A. 344/2020.
Gautam Khazanchi, Advocate, Appellant through VC from JC in CRL.A. 567/2020.
Mayank Mikhail Mukherjee, Advocate, Appellant through VC from JC in CRL.A. 5

JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J.

1. The appellants namely Rahis, the appellant of CRL.A. 344/2020, Javed, the appellant of CRL.A. 567/2020 and Jakir @ Chuhi, the appellant of CRL.A. 568/2020 assail the impugned judgment dated 22.02.2020 and the impugned order on sentence dated 28.02.2020 of the Court of the learned ASJ-02, E-Court, Shahdara, KKD, Delhi in relation to FIR No.244/16, PS Welcome registered under Sections 392/397/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 qua which the three appellants were held guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 392/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 read with Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and vide the impugned order on sentence dated 28.02.2020 were all sentenced to RI for a period of seven (7) years under Sections 392/34 r/w Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default of the payment of the said fine to further undergo SI for a period of three months with the benefit of Section 428 of the Cr.P.C. having been given to all the convicts. In as much as all the appeals arise out of the same impugned common judgment dated 22.02.2020 and impugned order on sentence dated 28.02.20