C.HARI SHANKAR
World Window Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Central Warehousing Corporation – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. This appeal, under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the 1996 Act”) challenges orders dated 17th June, 2020 and 15th August, 2020, passed by the learned arbitrator on applications preferred by the appellant M/s World Window Infrastructure and Logistics Pvt. Ltd. under Section 17 of the 1996 Act.
2. The appellant had, in fact, filed three applications before the learned arbitrator under Section 17, on 21st May, 2020, 18th June, 2020 and 26th June, 2020. The application dated 18th June, 2020 was, later, withdrawn. The orders impugned adjudicate the applications dated 21st May, 2020 and 26th June, 2020.
Facts
3. On 26th April, 2004, the respondent, Central Warehousing Corporation (CWC) issued a Request for Proposal (RFP), inviting tenders for providing Strategic Alliance Management and Operations and Commercial Services at six Inland Container Deports (ICDs)/Container Freight Stations (CFSs). Clause 4.6.5 of the RFP required the operator, to whom the tender was awarded, to submit a minimum yearly return and to commit for a minimum guarantee
BSES Ltd. v. Fenner India Ltd.
CV Rao v. Strategic Port Investments KPC Ltd.
DLF Ltd. v Leighton India Contractors Pvt. Ltd. (2018) 16 SCC 617
Gangotri Enterprises Ltd. v. Union of India
Himadri Chemicals Industries Limited v. Coal Tar Refining Co.
Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. v. State of Bihar
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. v. Tarapur & Co.
Hindustan Steelworks Construction Co. Ltd v. Tarapore & Co.
Sangyong Engineering & Construction Company Ltd. v. NHAI
State Bank of India v Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.