SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Tushar Grover – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Suresh Kumar Kait, J. -
The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.
1. Quashing of FIR No. 96/2020, under Section 324 IPC, registered at police station Shahdara, Delhi is sought on the ground that the matrimonial dispute between petitioner-husband and respondent No.2- wife, stands amicably settled in terms of Memorandum of Understandingcum-Compromise Deed dated 27.02.2021.
2. Notice issued.
3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and he submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conferencing and she has been identified to be the complainant of FIR question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that with the intervention of well-wishers and family members, parties have resolved their dispute in terms of Memorandum of Understanding-cum-Compromise Deed dated 27.02.2021 and they are happily living together. Further submitted that in terms of aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding, the complainant-wife has agreed to withdraw the pending cases against petitioner-husband and to enable the parties to lead
The amicable settlement of a matrimonial dispute, as evidenced by a Memorandum of Understanding-cum-Compromise Deed and the affirmation of the complainant, can be a basis for quashing FIR and proceed....
A matrimonial dispute resolved through a compromise deed justifies quashing the related FIR when the complainant expresses no remaining grievance.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that an amicable settlement of a matrimonial dispute, resulting in the grant of a decree of divorce, can be a valid ground for quashing the FIR ....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the court may quash an FIR and consequent proceedings if the parties have amicably settled their dispute and complied with the terms of the....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash FIR and proceedings under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC when the matrimonial dispute has been amicably resolved and no....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash an FIR and consequent proceedings when a matrimonial dispute has been amicably resolved and the complainant expre....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the court's authority to quash FIR and consequent proceedings when the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved through a Settleme....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that an amicable settlement and dissolution of marriage can be grounds for quashing an FIR under relevant sections of the IPC.
Court quashed FIR due to amicable settlement of matrimonial disputes, indicating that continued legal proceedings served no purpose.
The Court can quash an FIR if the underlying matrimonial dispute has been amicably resolved, affirming the principle that continuation of proceedings serves no purpose when parties are satisfied with....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.