SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
Tushar Grover – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT (Oral)

The hearing has been conducted through video conferencing.

1. Quashing of FIR No. 96/2020, under Section 324 IPC, registered at police station Shahdara, Delhi is sought on the ground that the matrimonial dispute between petitioner-husband and respondent No.2wife, stands amicably settled in terms of Memorandum of Understanding-cum-Compromise Deed dated 27.02.2021.

2. Notice issued.

3. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1/State accepts notice and he submits that respondent No.2 is present through video conferencing and she has been identified to be the complainant of FIR question by the Investigating Officer of this case, who is also present through video conferencing.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that with the intervention of well-wishers and family members, parties have resolved their dispute in terms of Memorandum of Understanding-cum-Compromise Deed dated 27.02.2021 and they are happily living together. Further submitted that in terms of aforesaid Memorandum of Understanding, the complainant-wife has agreed to withdraw the pending cases against petitioner-husband and to enable the parties to lead a hap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top